JC LOVES MM
The middle of this month we are to be treated to a major motion picture based on Dan Brown's publishing phenom "The Da Vinci Code" (abbreviated to DVC in the following). I've had friends (mainly non-Christians) who have read it and wondered what I thought of it, but I've resisted reading it until just this week. I was in Milwaukee airport looking for a book to kill the next 3 1/2 hours back to LA and thought, "Well, everyone who hasn't READ the DVC's going to be talking about it now that it's a movie, so I'd better read it so I have a right to discuss it." So, that's what I've been doing the past week.
This evening, I was just at two major book store chains in Torrance and was blown away by the sheer publishing hype surrounding the book - special tables with all of Brown's novels in hardback, paperback, deluxe photo editions - not to mention all the spin-offs on the Sacred Feminine, Mary Magdalene, the Gnostic Jesus, etc. prominently on display to catch some of the monetary fall-out from the DVC. Heck, there was even a Da Vinci Code weight loss book! It's a certifiable phenomenon, folks, and you'd better be prepared to talk about it, since every unchurched person in America is now going to consider her- or himself an expert on Christianity -- the REAL story they've been "hiding" from us these past 2000 years.
First off, to be fair, the book is a rousing good thriller (as well as a bit of a mushy romance). If Brown had made no pretensions that his work was based on historical fact, it would be a fun pseudo-historical light romance/thriller I could recommend unequivocally. (Not content with that, however, Brown prominently adds a page titled "Fact" at the beginning of the novel -- it is, after all, a novel -- and writes "All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals in this novel are accurate.")
A mini SYNOPSIS of the DVC for those who never intend to see the book or movie but want to keep up with the cultural buzz:
Dashing Harvard symbologist (?) Prof. Robert Langdon is called in by Paris police to explain the esoteric symbols and words the curator of the Louvre Museum, Jacques Saunière, managed to write around himself before he expired of a gunshot wound on the floor of the museum. It turns out to be clues to a world-shaking secret he's guarded that only he can now pass on. The police suspect the innocent Langdon of the deed, however, and he is about to be arrested until he is dramatically rescued from the museum by the granddaughter of the curator, the beautiful Sophie Neveu, a cryptologist with the French version of the FBI. They spend the entire novel on the lam from the French police, who, we are led to suspect, have connections to that dark, dastardly, ancient patriarchal institution, the Roman Catholic Church. The real assassin is an albino Spanish monk, Silas, who owes his life to the charity of Opus Dei, a dastardly, secretive ultra-conservative Catholic lay order that is intent on protecting the Church -- and humanity -- from the revelation of a deep, dark secret about the faith: Jesus Christ wasn't God after all, just an ordinary Jewish guy who married Mary Magdalene, had kids, moved to France, and opened a used car business in Toulon. (OK, I made that last bit up). Yes, the royal dynasty of Jesus is still around, folks! (Remember this is all the fruit of "research" and is guaranteed "accurate" by the author.)
The main legend Brown has incorporated into the novel is the (apparently true) legend of the HOLY GRAIL, which, it turns out, isn't a chalice at all but secret writings about this JC-loves-MM story (as well as MM's bones - she is actually a goddess, it turns out, but the kind that dies and decomposes) that were rescued from the Holy of Holies in the temple of Jerusalem no less during the Crusades by the Knights Templar, who, we learn (more "facts"), are still around today in a top secret society under the name "the Priory of Sion". (Btown swears to the accuracy of this in his "Facts" page, as well.) This Priory's historic task is to safeguard the JC-loves-MM truth and protect their descendents from those dastardly, bloodthirsty Catholics who've been out to knock them off for 2000 years. The Louvre curator turns out to be the grand-master of the Priory, one of four top men all killed the same day by Opus Dei's hitman. After many plot twists, betrayals, and code breakings -- and long theological discussions about what the true Christianity originally was with the sacred feminine restored to prominence (apparently it restores orgiastic sex rituals to their proper place in Christian liturgy, too - a "love feast" anyone?) -- Robert and Sophie end up in England and, guess what, falling in love as the sun sets over the hyperactive esoteric symbology of Rosslyn Chapel in Scotland, where it seems MM was buried at one time. (I won't give away the very end.)
The annoying part of all this is that there are so many historical and religious holes in Brown's "research" that you could drive a (Renault) truck through them. I am not a scholar of medieval esoterica, but certain whoppers in areas I DO know something about did shout out at me:
- Brown seems to think the Dead Sea Scrolls contained ancient writings about Christianity. Sorry. They were Jewish documents written by (adamantly) non-Christian Jews before and after Christ.
- Brown seems to think the "Catholic Church" (i.e. the one with the Pope living in the Vatican) has been around in its present form for 2000 years. He never seems to have picked up an encyclopedia to check on Church history, which all scholars agree wasn't divided into Western (Catholic)and Eastern (Orthodox) until 1054. Before that there was no "Roman Catholic Church". Brown doesn't even mention the word "Orthodox" in any part of the book, surely an insult to our Eastern Orthodox brethren, who would surely want to be in on the great institutional conspiracy against the "sacred feminine".
- Not content to damn Christianity for its misogyny against the divine male-female, Brown throws in a little historic revisionism on Judaism, as well, claiming that the Jewish temple/tabernacle originally honored both a male god (Yah) and a female god (Shekinah), and that the sacred name of the Jewish God (who apparently isn't "one", although that is the deepest claim of the religion) YHWH incorporates both "Yah" (the male deity, remember) and his female counterpart "Hawah", the Hebrew name for Eve. (Actually Hebrew has two different letters transliterated as H in English: one is used both times in YHWH; the other H is used in the name Havah, or Chavah in some spellings -- i.e. they aren't even the same letter. I'm a linguist and know a bit of Hebrew; these things stand out!) But remember, this was all "carefully researched" by Brown. From "God is two" to "God is one" - religious deflation in action! But if Judaism wasn't monotheist -- what is?
- Serious historians agree Constantine was the famous Roman emperor who convened the Council of Nicea in 325 AD, where the dual nature of Christ as God AND man was upheld by Christian bishops from all over the empire. But no, 1,681 years after the fact, Brown reveals the true version: Constantine always remained a pagan, yet somehow as secular ruler (with no church title or authority) he invented from scratch the doctrine that Jesus was God 300 years after Christ. Brown assures us that this doctrine had occurred to no one in Christian history before that - news to St. Paul, St. John, St. Athanasius, and all the Church Fathers before Nicea, who all claimed so. In a modern analogy, US Christians may mainly vote Republican, but I doubt few of them would take President Bush's pronouncements as authoritative on church doctrine!
... and many other minor rips in the story that weaken the fabric of the whole. (You might want to check out the "Da Vinci Hoax" by Olson and MIesel for more errors.)
If this sounds unfair, like I'm picking on "just a novel", remember that Brown claims absolute accuracy for the historical aspects of his book, both in the book itself and in TV and magazine interviews. He freely admits that he has an agenda to influence readers' religious beliefs, to shake Catholics' faith in their religion, and bolster the cause of gnosticism and the "sacred feminine". He is an unashamed evangelist for his beliefs -- one who's pulling in a fat wad of cash while doing it. And, more seriously, millions of historically and religiously illiterate readers are taking Brown's assertions about Jesus and Church history at face value. The book is tearing down peoples' beliefs and supplanting them with others. That's why I think, regardless of the lightweight appearance of the novel, it is a major threat to traditional, scholarly views of who Jesus was and how Christianity developed, one that intelligent Christians can't just ignore. JC-loves-MM is perhaps THE major version of the Christian faith on the market right now -- and it's gaining hundreds of thousands of converts, even within traditional churches. And the secular bookstores have no problem helping Brown propogate it while raking in billions in sales themselves.
All I'm saying is the Da Vinci Code buzz is currently reaching fever pitch and will be all we hear on TV or read in the paper for the next month or so (at least until the next big book-cum-movie comes along to replace it), so you should read it (or see the movie) and be ready to respond intelligently. It's better than the lame "I haven't read the book myself, but I think it's scandalous!"